NEET Practice Questions (MCQs) with Answers & Solutions

Practice free NEET NEET multiple-choice questions online with instant answers and detailed explanations. No login required.

All Physics Chemistry Botany Zoology
Register free to filter questions

What fundamental concept did de Broglie's hypothesis provide an explanation for in Bohr's model?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text states: 'Thus de Broglie hypothesis provided an explanation for Bohr’s second postulate for the quantisation of angular momentum of the orbiting electron.'

According to de Broglie's explanation, the quantized electron orbits and energy states are a direct consequence of:

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text says: 'The quantised electron orbits and energy states are due to the wave nature of the electron and only resonant standing waves can persist.'

What is the relationship between the circumference of the $n^{th}$ Bohr orbit ($2\pi r_n$) and the de Broglie wavelength ($\lambda$) according to de Broglie's explanation?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The context mentions the condition for stable orbits: '$2\pi r_n = n\lambda$, n = 1, 2, 3...'

Which of the following is true about the de Broglie wavelength of macroscopic objects compared to sub-atomic particles like electrons?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The context from 'DUAL_NATURE_OF_RADIATION_AND_MATTER' states: 'This wavelength is so small that it is beyond any measurement. This is the reason why macroscopic objects in our daily life do not show wave-like properties. On the other hand, in the sub-atomic domain, the wave character of particles is significant and measurable.'

De Broglie developed his hypothesis years after Bohr proposed his model. When did de Broglie explain Bohr's second postulate?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text explicitly states: 'The French physicist Louis de Broglie explained this puzzle in 1923, ten years after Bohr proposed his model.'

The quantization of angular momentum, $m v_n r_n = nh/2\pi$, is a direct result of combining de Broglie's wavelength hypothesis ($\lambda = h/mv_n$) with which other condition?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text shows the derivation: From Eq. (12.12), which is $2\pi r_n = n\lambda$, and substituting $\lambda = h/mv_n$, we get $2\pi r_n = n(h/mv_n)$, which rearranges to $m v_n r_n = nh/2\pi$. This shows the combination of de Broglie's wavelength and the standing wave condition leads to Bohr's quantization condition.

Which aspect of Bohr's model was considered 'most puzzling' before de Broglie's explanation?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text states: 'Of all the postulates, Bohr made in his model of the atom, perhaps the most puzzling is his second postulate. It states that the angular momentum of the electron orbiting around the nucleus is quantised'.

The de Broglie relation ($ \lambda = h/p $) inherently contains which fundamental concept about matter?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The context ('DUAL_NATURE_OF_RADIATION_AND_MATTER' summary) mentions: 'The dualism of matter is inherent in the de Broglie relation which contains a wave concept ($\lambda$) and a particle concept ($p$).'

The de Broglie wavelength is significantly measurable primarily for:

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

The text from 'DUAL_NATURE_OF_RADIATION_AND_MATTER' states: 'It is significantly measurable (of the order of the atomic-planes spacing in crystals) only in case of sub-atomic particles like electrons, protons, etc. (due to smallness of their masses and hence, momenta).'

Which of the following statements correctly describes the relationship between acceleration and velocity when a particle's speed is increasing?

You've reached today's free limit of 20 questions. Log in to keep practising for free.
Explanation

According to 'POINTS TO PONDER' point 2, 'If a particle is speeding up, acceleration is in the direction of velocity; if its speed is decreasing, acceleration is in the direction opposite to that of the velocity.' This directly answers the question.

Ready to ace NEET?

Free access · No credit card required

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. You can attempt every NEET question on this page for free without logging in, and check the correct answer with a detailed explanation instantly.

No account is required to attempt questions and view answers. A free account adds bookmarks, personal notes, and progress tracking.

The bank mixes NEET previous year questions (PYQs) with practice questions, each tagged with its exam appearances where applicable.