Practice free Physics NEET multiple-choice questions online with instant answers and detailed explanations. No login required.
A billiard ball moving with a speed of 8 m/s collides with an identical ball originally at rest. If the first ball stops after collision, then the second ball will move forward with a speed of..... (elastic collision)
In elastic head on collision velocites gets interchanged.
A bullet of mass m moving with velocity v strikes a block of mass M at rest and gets embedded into it. The kinetic energy of the composite block will be
By conservation of momentum, mv + M(o) = (m+M) v Velocity of composite block $ V = \left ( { m \over m+M} \right) v $ K.E. of composite block = $ { 1 \over 2} (M+ m)v^2 $
A body of mass m1 is moving with a velocity v. It collides with another stationary body of mass m1. They get embeded. At the point of collision, the velocity of the system
By conservation of momentum, $ m_1 V+ m_2 (0) = (m_1 +m_2) V$
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : A light body and heavy body have same momemtum. Then they also have same kinetic energy. Reason : Kinetic energy does not depend on mass of the body.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : Mountain roads rarely go straight up the slope. Reason : slope of mountains are large, therefore, more chances of vehicle to slip from roads.
The assertion is true because mountain roads rarely go straight up the slope due to safety and practical considerations. The reason is also true and is the correct explanation for the assertion. Steep slopes increase the risk of vehicles slipping due to reduced friction, which is why mountain roads are often designed with gradual inclines and curves.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : The change in kinetic energy of a particle is equal to the work done on it by the net force. Reason : Change in kinetic energy of particle is equal to the work done only in case of a system of one particle.
The change in kinetic energy of a particle is indeed equal to the work done on it by the net force, according to the work-energy theorem. However, this is not limited to a system of one particle; it applies to systems with multiple particles as well. Hence, both the assertion and the reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : Work done in moving a body over a closed loop is zero for every force in nature. Reason : Work done does not depend on nature of force.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : A weight lifter does no work in holding the weight up. Reason : Work done is zero because distance moved is zero.
When a weight lifter holds a weight up without moving it, no work is done because work is defined as the product of the force and the distance moved in the direction of the force. Since the distance moved is zero, the work done is zero. Hence, both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : stopping distance = Kinetic energy / Stopping force Reason : Work done in stopping a body is equal to K.E. of the body.
The assertion states that the stopping distance is equal to the kinetic energy divided by the stopping force, which is correct. The reason provided is that work done in stopping a body is equal to its kinetic energy, which also is correct. Since work done (W) is equal to force (F) times distance (d), and it equals the initial kinetic energy (K.E.), the stopping distance (d) can be derived as K.E. divided by the stopping force (F). Hence, both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
(ASSERTION & REASON) Assertion and Reason are given in following questions. Each question have four option. One of them is correct it. Assertion : The mass equivalent of 1000 kwh energy is 40 microgram. Reason : This follows from $ E = mc^2 $ where $ C = 3 \times 10 ^ 8 m/ s $
The assertion is that the mass equivalent of 1000 kWh energy is 40 micrograms, which is correct. The reason provided is that it follows from $E=mc^2$, where $c = 3 imes 10^8 ext{m/s}$. This is also correct. To find the mass, we use the equation $E=mc^2$. Given $E = 1000 ext{kWh} = 3.6 imes 10^9 ext{J}$, we get $m = rac{E}{c^2} = rac{3.6 imes 10^9}{(3 imes 10^8)^2} = 4 imes 10^{-8} ext{kg} = 40 ext{micrograms}$. Therefore, both assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Ready to ace NEET?
Free access · No credit card required
Yes. You can attempt every Physics question on this page for free without logging in, and check the correct answer with a detailed explanation instantly.
No account is required to attempt questions and view answers. A free account adds bookmarks, personal notes, and progress tracking.
The bank mixes NEET previous year questions (PYQs) with practice questions, each tagged with its exam appearances where applicable.